Frost Magazine

Books and Lifestyle

Frost Magazine

New Labour Leader Will Be Chosen in September, Reports Confirm

Labour, politics, leader, election, 2015Following one of the most controversial and tense General Elections of the 21st century, leader of the Conservative Party David Cameron finds himself at Number 10 once again after securing a total of 331 seats across the nation.

For Cameron, it was the “sweetest victory” but Friday 8th May had a far more sombre outcome for a whole host of MPs. After losing 49 seats, leader of the Liberal Democrats Nick Clegg made the heart-breaking decision to resign from the party after five years as Deputy Prime Minister.

Leader of the divisive UK Independence Party Nigel Farage lost his seat in his local constituency Thanet South, causing him to tell press he would be “taking summer off” – only for his resignation to later be revoked by the party.

Meanwhile, in Scotland, Scottish National Party leader Nicola Sturgeon’s campaign served to highlight the flaws in the first past the post system, having gained 56 out of 59 seats but fewer votes than UKIP’s 3 million. Commentators remarked upon how 4.29 million voters are represented by 59 seats in Scotland, whereas 3 million UKIP votes were gained by just two MPs.

However, with all the drama that unfolded on election result day, without a doubt one of the biggest stories has to be the resignation of Labour leader Ed Miliband, who told followers in an emotional speech that he would “never give up” fighting for the nation. Having fought tirelessly as the main opposition to David Cameron, it came as a huge surprise and caused a social media uproar when Labour achieved just 232 seats.

Now, one week into the Conservatives’ new term, social media is already awash with speculation as to who will take over from Ed Miliband’s five-year leadership. Previously, political experts at Bookies.com had their eyes upon Chuka Umunna, Andy Burnham and Yvette Cooper to step up to the plate.

Now, sources have confirmed that the new Labour leader will be announced on September 12th, and it seems that Umunna is keen to press on with his campaign. The 36-year-old is a Member of Parliament for Streatham and has also held the position of Shadow Business Secretary since 2011. At nine years Miliband’s junior, with a little more than a decade’s experience in politics, Umunna will doubtless draw some cynicism compared to a man who has been a member of the Labour Party since the age of 17.

However, he has assured voters that he can turn Labour around, but warns that it will be a “five-year plan.” Speaking from Swindon for his Facebook page, Umunna said: “Some have in recent days now suggested it is a 10-year project to get the party back into power. I don’t think we should have any truck with that. I think Labour can do it in five years.

“I want to lead that effort as part of a really big Labour team getting Labour back into office, and building a fairer and more equal society. That is why we joined the Labour party in the first place.”

 

 

Interview with Dame Judi Dench and Finty Williams

Interview with Dame Judi Dench and Finty WilliamsOn election day, on May 7th, at 8:25pm, More4 is showing The Vote, a play by James Graham, set in a polling booth during the last 90 minutes before the polls close. The play, which will be screened live from the Donmar Warehouse (at the end of a two-week run), is a unique and ambitious project featuring a cast of over 50, including some stellar names. Chief among them is the acting royalty that is Dame Judi Dench, and her daughter, Finty Williams, who play, appropriately enough a mother and daughter.

Meeting the pair in the quiet opulence of a library in a central London hotel, their bond and mutual affection is immediately palpable, as is their excitement about this remarkable play. Here, they discuss politics, plays and passion, and revel in the joys of working together.

Can you explain a little bit about the concept of The Vote?

F: James Graham and Josie Rourke came up with this idea to set a play in a polling station in Lambeth. They wanted to get a cross-section of people who would come into a polling station in an area like that. So it’s an extraordinary, 52-person event, and we’re a small part of it.

J: It’s impossible to get us all on stage at the same time. Just for the curtain acll.

F: It’s really extraordinary, we did the curtain call yesterday. I found it quite emotional. Seeing all those people on that stage.

J: It’s thrilling.

So, in that respect, is it completely unlike anything you’ve ever done before?

F: Yes!

J: Well, it’s not completely unlike anything I’ve done, because I’ve done the York Mystery Plays three times, and that’s a cast of an enormous amount of people all together, all rehearsing in bits and then getting it all together. This is nothing like that, in content, but I suppose in the working process it’s reminiscent of that. But we only came into it the week before last.

F: We thought we were starring in an epic! And then we saw the first run-through and realised we’re actually in fifteen minutes.

You’re in it longer than most…

F: We are, actually. And we’re very lucky, because we’re in it at the end.

Who do you play?

F: Amazingly, we play mother and daughter. We keep saying “Do we look like mother and daughter?” People look at us as though we’re mad.

J: And we play mother and daughter of the same name: Christine Lola Metcalfe.

F: And the same address.

J: Which is what causes the confusion in the play.

Although you’ve acted together before, is this the first time you’ve played mother and daughter?

F: I’ve been ma, as a younger person.

J: And you’ve been my daughter before. Only on film, though.

F: Oh yes, in Mrs Brown – we did that!

What was it that attracted you to the project?

F: Selfishly, we wanted to work together. But it’s amazing to be part of something that’s so exciting, that people who aren’t in it are so excited about. And at such an extraordinary time, as well. How lucky is that? And to be in a play by James, directed by Josie.

J: And for thirteen performances. It’s a part I’ve waited for all my life, I think. Being with Fint, and to open on one day and twelve days later to close. It’s thrilling.

F: The excitement never goes then.

J: It never goes, because you’re always nervous and always frightened. But it’s a real one-off, it’s exciting and innovative.

And it’s the first time you’ve performed at the Donmar for almost 40 years?

J: Yes. My husband was the first company into the Donmar, with Schweik in the Second World War in 1977, and we followed with…

F: You can say it…

J: I’m not saying it! We followed with the Scottish Play straight afterwards. Although I’ve been to the Donmar, of course, I haven’t played there again. It’s very nice being back there, although much of it I don’t recognise. I recognise the theatre itself, but not anything backstage. We were all in one dressing room back then, the whole company. You certainly couldn’t do that now.

F: It would be tricky to get 52 of us in one dressing room.

Finty, I read that you are most on edge when your family come and see you perform. Does that still apply when your mother is watching you from the other side of the stage?

J: We’re never the other side of the stage. We stick completely together!

F: It’s just about the people who you love the most, whose opinion you value the most. When they come and see it, that’s always a nerve-wracking thing, whether it’s ma, or my boyfriend, who’s an actor, or my son, or very close friends.

J: It’s always that night that you want to go best.

F: And you inevitably come out and go “Oh, but last night it was so much better!”

When you go and see each other in something, are you brutally honest afterwards, if it’s called for?

F: Ma is… this is like a therapy session! I think ma is more honest than I am sometimes. But we have a sort of understanding that if you haven’t enjoyed it then you appreciate the fact that the other person’s got to go on and do it for however many more weeks, and then you can be honest about what you thought of the play, or somebody else in it, or whatever, after they’ve finished.

On election night, the play is going to be broadcast live on More4. What’s that prospect like? Is it nerve-wracking? Do you even still get nervous?

J: Do I get nervous? Yes I do! I get nervous about putting one foot in front of the other. And more so as the years go by! But it’ll be very exciting, because it goes right up to ten o’clock.

F: So we’ll hear the actual exit polls at the end of the show.

J: And then there is a party that goes on all night. And breakfast for the survivors. I very much doubt I’ll be there by then. But, especially this time, what on earth is that night going to be like?

It’s filmed by fix rig cameras. Does that mean they’re very unobtrusive? Will you have performed with them in situ before the night itself?

F: I did The Scottish Play at The Globe…

You see, you can’t say it either…

F: I’m only not saying it because ma’s not saying it! Anyway, that was filmed.

J: I can’t tell you how obtrusive they are. I don’t think we’ll do a performance with them before the final one. We do camera rehearsals. But I don’t think there’s an actual performance with the punters in.

F: I think if you’re on of those actors who constantly looks out at the audience, you might notice them. But I try not to look. Do you?

J: Always try not to look.

There are some incidental scenes that take place in the play that will happen during the ad breaks of the More4 screening. Presumably that means the whole thing will have to be meticulously timed?

F: Yeah. I’m not going to worry about that.

J (laughing): That’s absolutely not our concern, is it?

F: I’m just going to say the lines, and hope we don’t take too long over them.

It’s a wonderful cast, isn’t it?

F: It’s extraordinary.

J: It’s a lovely cast.

F: One of my greatest friends from drama school is in it – Ghiv Chahidi. It’s taken us 21 years to work together. Although he’s worked with ma, and he’s worked with my boyfriend. But we’ve never worked together. And we end up standing next to each other at the end. But it’s amazing people, extraordinary to watch. You say the script is funny – and it is – but it’s genius, what certain people are doing with it. Proper comedic genius. It’s amazing.

What do you think The Vote is saying about the election, and about democracy in general?

J: I don’t know. It’s going to say a lot of different things to a lot of people, I think. It’s an across-the-board look at the situation at the moment and, in a way, how chaotic it is.

F: It’s such a diverse cross section of people who go into the polling station. It sounds naïve, but I’d sort of not really appreciated that you’d get that sort of cross section of people just coming in to one polling station.

J: Or not coming in. We’ve not said about that. All the people who are not going to vote. And feel no responsibility about it whatsoever.

Have you discussed among yourselves how you think your individual characters would vote?

J: My character votes Conservative. I’m settling for that. That’s the kind of person she is. And she’s appalled that her daughter turns to her and says “What do we vote?” She’s a dyed-in-the-wool Conservative.

Are either of you particularly political?

F: My boyfriend is. He’s been out canvassing for Labour. He’s really passionate about it. He’s desperately trying to get me and my son more politically-minded.

J: I have political views, and I voice them, and get very, very angry about things. In my family, we were advised not to talk about religion or politics when we were young. And so we’ve all been able to be very diverse and do what we wanted to do. And see other people’s points of view. Some of them more than others.

F (laughing): We like to see everyone’s point of view, apart from those who don’t agree with us.

It’s an extraordinary political moment. Are you excited about this election?

F: Slightly fearful.

J: Yes, I think I’m fearful. I’m curious about it. But I’m appalled, in a way, about the apathy there is about it. Someone said to me the other day “It’s the most boring election campaign that there’s ever been,” which I have to agree with, I’m afraid.

F: When they start picking up on how many kitchens people have… Really? Is that something that is going to sway people?

J: I heard a programme this morning saying that no-one goes out with a soapbox anymore, because there’s actual fear of doing that. It was interesting. There is a kind of behind the glass attitude to it all now – and actually not talking to people, not engaging with people. Saying the same things over and over again. It’s all election speak now. That’s not what it should all be about. I heard some young people talking, saying nobody talks a language they understand. No-one addresses what they’re thinking about. And indeed they don’t.

After you’ve performed on May 7th, what will you do…

J: Lie down!

Will you sit and watch the election into the early hours?

J: There’s going to be this big party, and breakfast.

F: I’m going to be at the party all night. I will stay there.

Will there be screens? Will it be a political thing?

J: Oh, I think definitely.

F: I’ll be there. I’ll be one of the ones having breakfast.

What’s the best thing about working together?

J: Shorthand. And the fact that we like it so much. We don’t have to pretend that we like it. We actually like it. Michael used to have an expression. He used to say “There are some jobs you run to do.” And for all the fear of having three days’ rehearsal for this, it is a job I run to do, and I can’t wait to actually have that thing of being onstage with Fint.

Was it the same sort of experience for you when you worked with Michael?

J: Yes, it was. You’re frightened for the other person too, so it’s double fright. We did Mr and Mrs Nobody, and Mikey said “We’re going to have such a blast doing this. Lots of laughs, and it’s not very long, so then we’ll get to go home.” Well, it was the hardest thing you can imagine. It was thrilling to do, but we were so tired at the end of the evening.

F: And the learning was tricky, wasn’t it? Ma used to be upstairs in our house with me, learning lines. Dad would be downstairs. We’d have a running supper, it would go round the house.

Was it things like doing lines with your mum that inspired you into the same line of work?

F: No. I don’t know if it’s the same thing if you’re the daughter of a brilliant brain surgeon, who is incredibly good at what they do, works with incredible people and – not quite the same for the brain surgeon – gets to wear great costumes. That’s inspiring. And ma makes it great fun. I spent most of my teenage years in the National Theatre. Mum would go on to do a scene in Hamlet, come back, get changed to go back on and do another scene, and she’d come back and I’d be wearing her entire first costume in the dressing room. That was what I loved. And to hear the applause at the end for her. That still really gets me. That’s the person I love, and they’re being appreciated by all these people. I watch Britain’s Got Talent, and someone’s there saying they’re proud of their parent or their daughter, and then they get a standing ovation, and I’m in floods of tears. It’s a really deep-seated pride.

J: Fint originally wanted to be an acrobatic nurse. And we were very, very keen. Michael said “You’ve got to do it.” Can you imagine? Swinging up the ward to take somebody’s temperature upside down. Absolutely thrilling.

How did you feel when she revealed her intention to go into acting?

We were incredibly excited about it, and said “I suppose it was inevitable.”

What are the roles that have meant the most to you over the years?

J: Over sixty years!

F: Anything at The Globe, because it’s just the best. Playing Maria in Twelfth Night at The National. Ma did a play called Entertaining Strangers when I was about 14, which totally changed my life, I loved it so much. It was directed by Peter Hall, and it was in the Cottesloe. And I remember saying to ma “If I coukld just be in a play directed by Peter Hall at the Cottesloe, I’d be the happiest person in the world. And when I was doing Bedroom Farce, that he directed, which was another big favourite, he asked me to audition for Maria in Twelfth Night in the Cottesloe. And I got the job, and I came out and phoned ma, and I stood on the phone to ma outside the National howling, literally howling. And later on, we were rehearsing for it, and it was all wonderful, and we were doing Malvolio’s letter scene, and they’d picked up a load of letters from the props store, and I opened a letter, and it was one of the letters that had been used in Entertaining Strangers all that time before. That was probably the best. Ma, 60 years, go for it!

J: It’s really for people, for actors and actresses and the company and the director of course, that you remember things. Plays I did with Mikey. When we got the chance to work together it was thrilling. Not so thrilling when we did The Merchant of Venice, a play I don’t like very much. We were just married, and I turned to him and said “I speak too long; but ’tis to peize the time, To eke it and to draw it out in length, To stay you from erection.” And it’s ‘election’ of course. At which point, the Royal Shakespeare band just put their instruments down and had to walk off.

I loved playing Anthony and Cleopatra, because I was an unbelievably unlikely choice to play Cleopatra. I loved every minute of it. And I loved working with Peter. And I loved A Little Night Music, getting to sing and do Cabaret.

F: There was also an amazing show she did called The Gift of the Gorgon, which she didn’t have the best time doing, it was a very tricky play. But it floored me. Amazing.

Are there any particular parts that either of you would particularly like to play?

J: I never know what part I should do. I can never think if what I’d like to do, I wait until somebody says “This is a part you ought to have a go at.” Fint?

F: I want to play Miss Adelaide in Guys and Dolls. Really badly. And I’d like to work with [boyfriend] Joe, properly. Like ma got to do with dad.

J: Perhaps we could all be in a play together.

F: We could age-up Guys and Dolls, and you could play Miss Adelaide.

J: No, no, no. I’d be an old person, sitting in a chair watching. Tapping my foot to the music.

If you could work on one other project together, what would you choose?

J: I like a new play.

F: Something where we have a big entrance at the end, down a big fl… actually, not down a big flight of stairs.

J (laughing): I could come down in a lift.

F: You could have a Stair Lift. And we could be wearing wonderful red dresses cut up to the thigh.

J: That would be very, very good!

F: And an amazing dance number. Maybe I’ll do the dance number. You can just stand still and do something extraordinary in the middle.

The Vote is on Thursday May 7th, at 8:25pm, More4

With thanks to Channel 4. 

 

 

‘The UK must not abandon Afghan women to the Taliban’ Olivia Colman

Olivia ColmanThe UK must not abandon Afghan women, actress Olivia Colman warned after featuring in documentary which explores the dangers women face while undertaking ordinary jobs there.

A BBC documentary, Speaking Out, Losing Lives,  on Radio Four explored the extraordinary risks women in Afghanistan face. Award-winning BBC correspondent Lyse Doucette has travelled to the country to talk to women and girls about the future of their country, at a time when security is deteriorating following the departure of foreign troops from the country.

The programme, produced with Amnesty International, features the stories of three women: a gynaecologist, the head teacher of a girls’ school and a women’s rights political advocate. Originally conceived as a performance of a play based on their testimony, Even If We Lose our Lives, commissioned by Amnesty, the programme now features extracts from the play but not interviews with the real women on whom it’s based as two of them have recently been forced into hiding due to renewed security threats.

Actress Olivia Colman voices the women’s stories. She said:

“Being a teacher, a doctor, a politician – these are important jobs but they shouldn’t be dangerous ones.

“The brave women whose words I’ve voiced risk so much to educate, to care and to shape the future of their country. Women like these are the hope for Afghanistan’s future and the UK must not abandon them to the Taliban now.

“It’s an honour to read these brave women’s words.”

Last week, to coincide with the London Conference on Afghanistan, a coalition of charities and aid organisations, the British and Irish Agencies Afghanistan (BAAG), released survey results showing that aid workers and rights campaigners in Afghanistan feel dramatically less safe than a year ago.

Sixty percent of the Afghans who responded reported that they felt less safe in their work during the past year, with half of survey respondents stating that either they, or their colleagues, have suffered intimidation or death threats during that time.

Amnesty has been running an “Occupational Hazards” campaign over the last year, drawing attention to the dangers women in work face in Afghanistan. Further details are available at www.amnesty.org.uk/afghanistan

Equal Pay Day: Female? You Will Work The Rest Of The Year For Free

Today is Equal Pay Day- so called because the average pay gap between men and women is so large that women effectively work for free from November 4th until the end of the year. Depressing, isn’t it? Something must be done about it. Maybe women should strike. I am up for it. A holiday from now until 2015? Sounds fun.

It is not just because women tend to bear the brunt of childcare, although more paternity rights and men picking up their slack in this area would help, read this brilliant article on equal pay from the Huffington Post. This year equal pay day is three days earlier than last year because the pay gap has widened. Truly shocking. For every £1 earned by a man, a women gets 80p.

Feminist_Suffrage_Parade_in_New_York_City,_1912

On Equal Pay Day 2014, Iain McMath, CEO of Sodexo Benefits and Rewards Services had some great comments on how pay differences are affecting employees and what employers can do to help:

“It is alarming to see that the difference in take home pay for men and women is actually increasing, despite it being over 40 years since the arrival of the Equal Pay Act. With figures now showing that women earn 15.7% less than their male colleagues, this inequality shows no signs of abating.

It is unsurprising, therefore, that women are suffering financial consequences of this disparity. According to our recent survey of UK workers, 54% of women say they struggle to put aside any funds due to limited disposable income, compared to just 40% of men, which clearly shows the impact that unequal pay has on financial planning.

Equal Pay Day serves to highlight the fact that there is still significant work to be done before men and women are treated equally in the workplace. Until this happens, employers need to be aware of the financial stress that many of their employees are facing, and must take steps to ensure they are helping staff to manage their money and reach their financial goals.”

 

 

Channel 4 Dispatches Investigates The Scottish Referendum

scottishreferenduminvestigationreferendumChannel 4 Dispatches looked at claims of personal attacks and mudslinging on both sides of the Scottish referendum debate. (The Great British Break-up? Channel 4 Dispatches. aired 8pm Monday 7 July, available on 4OD)

Among the stories covered in the programme are allegations that many businesses have been pressured into staying silent; accusations that the Westminster government has been misleading voters in Scotland and the revelation that British embassies have been instructed to support the case for a No vote.

Polls show the single most important issue for voters is what might happen to the Scottish economy after independence. While business leaders are probably best placed to answer some of these questions, Channel 4 Dispatches investigates allegations that many have been pressured into staying silent.

Channel 4 Dispatches contacted 50 companies and business leaders believed to have concerns over independence. Five told the programme privately they’d been contacted by the Scottish Government and said they felt pressured to stay quiet about their views. Of the five, one claimed they had been visited by a Minister, two claimed they received a phone call from a Minister, and two claimed they had received a call from the First Minister’s office. And a further 14 claimed to know of other businesses who felt under pressure.

Gavin Hewitt, the former Chief Executive of the Scotch Whisky Association tells Channel 4 Dispatches that he or senior members of his staff met with Angus Robertson – the SNP leader in the House of Commons – on at least six occasions over the past two years:

“He and the SNP have regularly tried to get the message to the Scotch Whisky Association that the Scotch Whisky Industry should stay out of the independence debate. He was, I think, trying to neuter business comment. There was a genuine fear that in fact if we were seen to scupper by coming out publically against independence, there would be retribution down the track.”

“Regardless of whether the SNP win or lose the referendum vote in September they will be in power for many years to come and that those people who have stood against them or worked against the central plank of their policy, independence, will be singled out and will be remembered.”

In response, the Scottish Government told Channel 4 Dispatches that Mr Hewitt’s claims about Mr Robertson are ‘utterly false’.

The programme interviews Professor Patrick Dunleavy, Public Policy Chair at the London School of Economics, who says the UK government’s statement that the Scottish taxpayer would have to fork out £2.7 billion in set up costs misused his figures.

“It’s very hard to describe it in polite terms actually, it’s very crude, it’s alarmist, it’s not been checked and it rests on a whole series of, you know, false steps…That makes this a very dubious document. A dodgy dossier you might call it…. When you take into account all the factors that I’ve been just considering, my actual set up costs, you know the costs that you lose irretrievably just from going independent would be I guess around £150 to £200 million, that compares with numbers given in the treasury document which range from £1.5 billion to £2.7 billion. Given this is quite a polarised debate you should be checking your facts and contributing unimpeachable information.”

In response, a government spokesperson told Channel 4 Dispatches that it had ‘cited several external sources’ to provide context in their calculations for the set up costs.’

The programme reveals new information about what happened following the decision by the CBI to publicly back a No vote. This led to many of its members pulling out, most of whom claimed they’d made the decision in order to remain politically neutral. Channel 4 Dispatches has obtained emails which reveal the role played in this pull-out by the SNP’s John Swinney.

The emails reveal how Mr Swinney seized on the decision by Scottish Enterprise to pull out of the CBI to push others to do the same, with his media advisor urging Visit Scotland to follow Scottish Enterprise’s lead and pull out of the CBI: ‘Mr Swinney has made said that other public bodies should follow suit, if they are CBI members,’ one email states.

Another senior official in the Finance Office emailed the CEO of Visit Scotland, asking him: ‘Can you please let me know … when a resignation letter can be issued.’

In response, a spokesperson for the Deputy First Minister told Channel 4 Dispatches: “A poll from the British Chambers of Commerce concluded that the referendum and the prospect of an independent Scotland “has left most [UK] businesses unfazed.” John Swinney’s comments “were in the context of the CBI” taking “a political stance” that raised “questions as to whether public bodies could remain members of the CBI and continue to meet their statutory obligation of impartiality.”

The programme also includes details of cables, released under the Freedom of Information Act, which the Foreign Office has sent to its embassies around the world. While the government has said that it is neutral on the referendum, one cable, sent out to embassies and consulates, suggests otherwise. It states that the British Government is: ‘Not neutral… and will be actively campaigning to secure a referendum result that will keep the United Kingdom together.’

In response, a government spokesperson told the programme: “The Prime Minister has always been clear that this is a decision for people in Scotland to make but it is no secret that he believes those living outside Scotland should make their views known.”

Lord Sutherland, Former Vice Chancellor of Edinburgh University claims that some of those running Scottish universities have also come under pressure to stay out of the debate despite concerns about the impact of independence.

Professor Chris Whatley from Dundee University tells Channel 4 Dispatches what happened when SNP Sports Minister Shona Robison caught wind of his appearance chairing a Better Together event in a personal capacity, and wrote an urgent email to the Principal of Dundee University.

“I think people did see this as, as an attempt to stifle, public debate, I mean there isn’t any threat or there hasn’t been any threat to public speech in Scotland as long as you’re saying yes. I guess I was seen as a threat,” he tells the programme.

Lord Sutherland adds:
“To be questioned by a Scottish Minister about the propriety of his expressing views in public is disgraceful. It sends the message that you’re being watched, if Big Brother’s looking down on you, then there’s an implicit threat. … The danger is that you have a regime that does things by stealth rather than argues things out in public.”

The spokesperson for the Deputy First Minister told Channel 4 Dispatches that: “Shona Robison’s questions related to the impartiality of the Five Million Questions project” and that “In terms of wider academic views, we welcome all contributions.”

 

 

 

The Rise of Topless Activism: But Is It a Good Or Bad Thing?

There is a worrying new trend in feminism: topless activism. Not men being topless. Women being topless because of course. Even more worrying is the number of women falling for it. The trendy #freethenipple campaign has gained ground when, in fact, it does nothing but mock the real struggle for equality. Amanda Foreman wrote an amazing piece on this for The Sunday Times. She starts off:

“New York last week was awash with nipples. Actually, it was a tiny corner of downtown Manhattan. And it wasn’t so much a sea of breasts, as a handful (or an eyeful) of women who went topless in support of a campaign to “free the nipple”. For the uninitiated, #FreeTheNipple, was the brainchild of 29-year-old Lina Esco, who felt it was unfair that men can show their nipples in public in all 50 states, whereas for women it’s a mere 13. Esco struggled in comparative obscurity until her protest was annexed recently by Scout Willis, daughter of Bruce Willis and Demi Moore. She is locked in an ongoing struggle with Instragram over the freedom to post naked selfies. The internet company maintains a blanket policy against nude photos as a way of deterring pornographers and paedophiles.” 

She then goes on to point out that the previous week in Washington another struggle for women’s rights was happening, Senator Claire McCaskill of Missouri and others were part of a task force to confront the increase in violence against female students on US Campuses. Up a shocking 20% this year. The White House is holding hearings and using Title IX, a 1972 civil rights law, to force universities to provide better protection for female students.

Foreman also goes on to say that “one does not necessarily fuel the other” and makes the good point that countries in which women are covered up are worse for violence against women and sexism but she has a problem with ‘the American tendency to confuse life and death struggles for personal freedom with exhibitionist demonstrations of myopic self-regard’. I think this is well said but I don’t think it is just an American thing.

When it comes to the nipple there is nothing to free. It is everywhere, in television shows, films, magazines, Page Three, online porn,  even women’s magazines for god’s sake. I mean, why do fashion spreads in women’s magazines nearly always have a topless women in? It is just weird.

Thing is, I am not against nudity. Neither is Amanda. She posed nude for Tatler at one point. (no nipples though).  I am not a prude. I wouldn’t go topless on a beach but I love Helmut Newton’s fashion photography. The women in those pictures are all sexy, strong and in charge. Nudity, as with most things in life, is about context.

Femen, the Ukrainian political group, is run by a man and all of the women are slim and gorgeous. When it was Femen member  Inna Shevchenko’s birthday, Femen wrote: “Femen congratulates its most famous leader, real revolutionary, wunderkind of feminism and beauty Inna Shevchenko with her birthday!” The most important word there is ‘beauty’. Femen calls itself a feminist group but is just another organisation that has become famous through the exploitation of women and their bodies. 

They may be put in the paper, but no one is listening to what they are saying. The most interesting thing about Femen’s coverage is how big the pictures are of near-naked beautiful women, compared to how small the print of whatever they are protesting against is.  Anyone can get in the paper for getting their breasts out. It does not take talent or skill, women have been doing it for years and men have been exploiting them and selling magazines and newspapers off the back of that exploitation. When Vladimir Putin was protested against by a topless activist, his leering, pervy facial expression said it all.

Femen: the rise of topless activism

They are called private parts for a reason. People may call me a prude and think I am a killjoy but, actually, it’s rude to try and make someone else live by your rules. Breasts may be ‘functional’ but so is my vagina. I don’t whip that out either.

Some women think that a women going topless is the same thing as a man going topless. Or at least should be. Unfortunately, that cannot happen now. Breasts have been too sexualised for too long. It isn’t fair but the world isn’t fair. Breasts are sexual. They always will be. A topless man is not the same as a topless women. It’s not fair, but it is a fact.

If you don’t believe me, do an experiment. Flash your breasts at a man and then ask him what you said after. If he knows what you said, let everyone know his name; he deserves a medal or something.

Topless activism gets publicity but that doesn’t mean it works. Sex sells and the world is full of perverts. People love boobs and will use any excuse to print them, as long as they are attached to an attractive women.

Even the daughter of Demi Moore and Bruce Willis, Scout,  has gotten in on the act. ‘Protesting’ against Instagram not letting her post topless pictures of herself on Instagram. She then said she was going to ‘move to Europe’. She seems sweetly unaware that in ‘Europe’ we all wear clothes and that walking around topless is called indecent exposure.

She tweeted

Scout LaRue Willis @Scout_Willis 

I’m moving to Europe, people’s victorian sensibilities need to calm the fuck down

What @instagram won’t let you see 

Scout Willis walked around the streets of New York topless to make her point, but she could have chosen something more pressing to use her celebrity for. Like the fact women are stoned to death by their own families or teenagers being raped and then hung from trees in India.

Scout Willis #freethenipple protest Scout Willis #freethenipple protest

 

The thing is, we have to decide what we want. Feminism can’t have it both ways. Either we want to get rid of Page Three because it is wrong and objectifies women or we want to get our nipples out to be ‘equal’ to men. Which one is it? Easy. If you want to be equal to men then ask to be paid the same as them. Ask for the same opportunities. There are more MPs called John in the House of Parliament than there is women. The average college graduate in the US who becomes a mother will sacrifice a million dollars over her lifetime and single women make 90% of what men make. The list of what to fight for is endless and, trust me, freeing our nipples is the least of it.

 

What do you think? Is Topless Activism a good thing?

 

 

 

Bowe Bergdahl And Robert Bergdahl Are A Disaster For Obama But He Can Recover

bergdahls-praises-Allah-at-white-house-obama-not-happy

A lot has been said about the video of Bowe Bergdahl’s father praising Allah at the White House. Frankly, most of it is wrong. Obama was not smiling. Anyone who knows body language and looks at the video will see that, actually, that was a grimace. President was also obviously angry, he knew how much political damage had just been done to him. I don’t know who is advising Obama at the moment, or why he let five terrorists go for one man but whoever is advising him needs to either be fired or given the worst job in politics somewhere far away from the President to make a strong point. American Ambassador of Outer Mongolia or Siberia sounds good.

I don’t know if Obama knew what the Arabic meant at the time, but he knew it was enough to damage him in the eyes of his enemies, most of whom constantly try to make the President out as not a true American.

Robert Bergdahl said at the press conference of his son’s release, “Bism allah alrahman alraheem,” which translates from Arabic to English as “in the name of Allah, the merciful, the compassionate.” It is said before every chapter in the Koran except the 9th (the chapter of the sword). The level of stupidity in quoting the Koran at the White House, even more than ten years after 9/11 is insurmountable. Not to mention insensitive. He may have meant it in a well-meaning way, but it was not that he spoke in Arabic, it was the praise of Allah, the same Allah whose name the pilots flew into the World Trade Centre for. The beard didn’t help. Robert Bergdahl grew it out of ‘solidarity’ for his captured son but we live in a visual world. How things look matter, and it looks bad.

Bowe Bergdahl allegedly left a note saying he wanted to renounce his citizenship before he went AWOL. Then six American soldiers lost their lives trying to rescue him from the Taliban. This is the biggest crisis of Obama’s career and the shades of Homeland (incidentally one of the President’s favourite shows) does not help. The President did not know what Robert Bergdahl was going to say, and he clearly didn’t like what he did say. No man left behind is very American. Even if the man is controversial and not liked within the armed forces because of his desertion.

To rub salt into the wound, the Taliban have released a video of the release of Bowe Bergdahl. Despite all of this, I believe the President can still recover. He just needs to surround himself with the right people.

What do you think?

 

Laura Bush: ‘First Ladies Don’t Deserve Salaries’

In a C-SPAN interview for First Ladies: Influence and Image, former first lady Laura Bush, has said that first ladies don’t deserve to be paid.

Credit: Wikipedia

Credit: Wikipedia

“There are plenty of perks, believe me. A chef, that was really great, I miss the chef.”

She then went on to point out the sexist double-standard.

“That’s what we’ll have to come to terms with, Certainly a first gentleman might continue to work at whatever he did.

I think that the American public sees the first lady in very glamorous circumstances…I think what they may not imagine looking at the White House from the outside is that it’s actually a very normal life upstairs…The first lady probably, and I know I did, lays on the couch an reads a book. In my case, my cat would always curl up next to me.”

Frost Magazine